The class-action complaint in this matter was filed on April 30, 2002, and sought damages from defendants, all automo bile dealers, for violations of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act (CFA), N.J.S.A. Plain tiffs' cross-appeal seeks interest on the fee award plus an award of appellate fees and costs. Plaintiffs assert the judge did not abuse his discretion in either respect and that defendants are seeking to mire their counsel fee application in a second round of liti gation, contrary to Furst, supra, 182 N.J. ![]() Defendants contend that the judge abused his discretion both when he set the lodestar and when he enhanced it. The judge set the lodestar at $626,114.33 and enhanced that sum by forty-five percent. This appeal requires us to decide whether the award of $907,865.79 in counsel fees in this class action was consistent with the standards established by Furst v. ![]() Skalet (Mehri & Skalet, PLLC) of the Wash ington D.C. Wolf argued the cause for respon dents (Galex Wolf, LLC attorneys Steven A. Ciarrocca argued the cause for appellants (Ciarrocca & Ciarrocca, attorneys Mr. On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Civil Part, Middlesex County, Docket No. and MALOUF BUICK, INC.,īefore Judges Cuff, Fisher and C.L. and MALOUF LEASING AND RENTAL CORPORATION MALOUF FORD, INC MALOUF LINCOLN MERCURY, INC. RICHARD MALOUF RICHARD MALOUF d/b/a MALOUF AUTO GROUP MALOUFĪUTO GROUP d/b/a MALOUF LINCOLN MERCURY INC., MALOUF FORD, INC., ![]() ALLEN and STEPHANIE FIGUEROA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Select a dealership below for more information about that new car dealer including reviews, address, phone numbers, hours, map and directions, makes sold, and resources on trade-in appraisal value.RUTH M. All Ford Dealers Near North Brunswick, NJ
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |